Proposed Experimental Design for Measuring Anger

The previous post has an experimental diagram I proposed for measuring the effect of elicited anger and  recovery rate to normal status. Blood pressure measurements are used to calculate anger recall (dependent variable #1). Blood pressure is also used to measure metabolic recovery rate (dependent variable #2). Anger recall is defined as metabolic reactions resulting from recalling specific anger eliciting memories (i.e. fight with significant other). Neutral recall is the reference no-anger eliciting recall condition used for the control group (i.e. recall one of the 3 memorized facts taken from a short written passage). Subsequent postings will talk about the hypoteses (plural) and the statistical test that can be used in this experimental design.

Experiment Flow Diagram for Anger

This illustration has helped me understand the construct of 'anger' that I am developing. The diagram will also be useful as a guide to complete writing the protocol, to conduct the actual experiment, and to document the results.

Understanding Relationships Video

I wanted to share this video that offers a helicopter view (broad and general) about human relationships. The video is in English with Spanish subtitles.

Statistical Method Decision Tree

Here is a very helpful decision tree for figuring out which statistical method should be used in the research study.

Culture and Value Orientation: Human Nature

I wanted to share what I was reading today in one of my textbooks (Clinical and Forensic Interviewing of Children and Families, by Jerome M. Sattler). Sattler cites earlier work by Luckhohn, 1958 and Speigel, 1982 in order to outline differences in cultural value orientations within five different areas. This this post paraphrases my notes on the first of the five areas.
1. Human Nature is composed of the following three value orientations:
a. Evil Orientation - This orientation holds that everyone is born with evil orientations that need to be controlled before they manifest themselves.
b. Good Orientation - Everyone is born good and there is no need for control because control would suppress the good from being manifested.
c. Mixed orientation - everyone of us is born with both evil and good orientations. Suppression is needed to keep the evil orientations from manifesting. On the other hand, encouragement and facilitation are also needed to allow the good orientations to manifest themselves.
My personal opinion: I believe that all of us are born with the capacity for both good and evil. As we grow and adapt, we begin to develop tendencies towards the things we find to be most effective in helping us succeed within the environment that we find ourselves.
Subsequent posts will cover the other four areas of of human value orientations:
2. Relationship between person and nature
3. Time history
4. Activity level
5. Social relations
If you have Sattler' book, you can find this on page 263.

Check Out This New Source of Information

I just wanted to make a quick post and share this new source of information. It is an official blog for graduate students published by the American Psychological Association (APA). I recommend it: www.gradpsychblog.org

Rant About Free Will vs Determinism

This post is a continuation of my earlier rant about Frederick Hegel, where I wrote "Hegel's rationale is that, since any given phenomenon has an exact opposite, then on one side we have the thesis and on the other side we have the antithesis" (see December 11, 2013 post: 
Constant Tension and the Cause of Human Existence: Late Night Philosophical Rant).

Determinism holds that every event is the consequence (the effect) of a previous set of conditions (the cause). A simplification I hear a lot is that "everything always happens for a reason". This can be considered to mean that nothing ever happens by chance, that everything we do is predetermined, that we have no power to change our future, and that there is no such thing as free will.

By contrast, in my humble view, I believe that determinism and free will are two paradoxical sides of the same coin. To use Hegel's terminology, determinism can be considered the thesis and free will the antithesis (or vice versa). I believe that this paradoxical existence of determinism and free will form the necessary tension that is necessary for us to adapt and evolve. Yes, the preexisting conditions will always dictate the set of choices that will be available to us at any specific point in time (thesis: determinism). But, it is always up to us to make a choice (antithesis: free will).

Once we have made a choice, the tension between thesis and antithesis is resolved and the choice we make becomes the synthesis. Furthermore, this choice we make becomes part of a new set of conditions (new cause) that will have a unique set of future consequences (new effect). In other words, the synthesis (our choice) will become the new thesis.